section 2

zh-CN.html

@@ -474,56 +474,51 @@ Also, <b></b> bolds a word/phrase, and <i></i> italicizes a word/phrase.
 <!-- Simple Contagions -->
 
 <words id="simple_simple">
-	<i>Let's put aside the "threshold" thing for now.</i>
-	Below: we have a person <icon name="red"></icon> with some information.
-	Some <i>mis</i>information. "Fake news", as the cool kids say.
-	And every day, that person spreads the rumor, like a virus, to their friends.
-	And they spread it to <i>their</i> friends. And so on.
+	<i>现在让我们暂时忽略“临界值”。</i>
+	如下：我们有个小红脸 <icon name="red"></icon> 以及一些信息。
+	一些 <i>错误</i> 信息。“假新闻”，就像那些酷小孩说的那样。
+	每一天，这个人都会将谣言像病毒一样传播给他们的朋友。
+	然后他的朋友们再将它传播给他们的朋友。 <br>如此反复。
 	<br>
 	<b>
-	Start the simulation! <div class="darr"></div>
-	(p.s: you can't draw <i>while</i> the sim's running)
+	开始模拟！ <div class="darr"></div>
+	（附：模拟进行时你不能进行绘制）
 	</b>
 </words>
 
 <words id="simple_simple_2">
-	Note: despite the negative name, "contagions" can be good or bad (or neutral or ambiguous). 
-	There's strong statistical evidence<ref id="contagion"></ref> that
-	smoking, health, happiness, voting patterns, and cooperation levels
-	are all "contagious" --
-	and even some evidence that suicides<ref id="suicides"></ref> and mass shootings<ref id="shootings"></ref> are, too.
+	注意：尽管这是个消极的名称（译注：原文 contagion 一般指疾病的接触传染），“传播”可能是好的或坏的（或中性或不明确的）。
+	有强有力的统计数据<ref id="contagion"></ref>显示，抽烟、健康、幸福指数、投票倾向以及默契度都具有“传播性” --
+	甚至一些证据表明自杀<ref id="suicides"></ref>和大规模枪击<ref id="shootings"></ref>也是如此。
 </words>
 
 <words id="simple_simple_end">
-	<next wiggle>well that's depressing <div class="rarr"></div> </next>
+	<next wiggle>真令人沮丧 <div class="rarr"></div> </next>
 </words>
 
 <words id="simple_cascade">
-	Indeed it is.
-	Anyway, <b>PUZZLE TIME!</b>
+	的确如此。
+	不管怎样，<b>解谜时间！</b>
 	<br>
-	Draw a network &amp; run the simulation,
-	so that <i>everyone</i> gets infected with the "contagion".
+	绘制网络 &amp; 运行模拟，让每个人受到“传播”的影响。
 	<br>
-	(new rule: you can't cut the <i>thick</i> connections)
+	（新规则：你无法斩断 <i>粗</i> 连接）
 </words>
 
 <words id="simple_cascade_end">
-	<next wiggle>fan-flipping-tastic <div class="rarr"></div> </next>
+	<next wiggle>精彩 <div class="rarr"></div> </next>
 </words>
 
 <words id="simple_post_cascade">
-	This madness-spreading is called an <b>"information cascade"</b>.
-	Mr. Newton fell for such a cascade in 1720.
-	The world's financial institutions fell for such a cascade in 2008.<ref id="subprime"></ref>
+	这种疯狂扩散被称为<b>“信息级联（information cascade）”</b>。
+	牛顿爵士在 1720 年被这样的级联击倒。
+	2008 年，全球的金融机构被这样的级联击倒。<ref id="subprime"></ref>
 	<br><br>
-	However: <i>this simulation is wrong.</i>
-	Most ideas <i>don't</i> spread like viruses.
-	For many beliefs and behaviors, you need to be "exposed" to the contagion more than just once
-	in order to be "infected".
-	So, network scientists have come up with a new, better way to 
-	describe how ideas/behaviors spread, and they call it...
-	<next wiggle>“<i>Complex</i> Contagions!” <div class="rarr"></div> </next>
+	然而：<i>这样的模拟是错误的。</i>
+	大多数思想 <i>不会</i> 像病毒那样扩散。
+	对于许多信仰和行为，为了“受到感染”，你需要不止一次被暴露给“传播”。
+	所以，网络科学家提出了一种新的，更好的方式来描述思想/行为如何扩散，他们称之为...
+	<next wiggle>“<i>复杂</i> 传播！” <div class="rarr"></div> </next>
 </words>
 
 <!-- Complex Contagions -->