taiwanese translation and mask fixes also link archive

This commit is contained in:
Nicky Case 2020-05-17 16:16:39 -04:00
parent b765e065cd
commit ed1fec0dce
4 changed files with 12 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -287,7 +287,7 @@
<h3 id="toc_0">Scenario 0: Do Absolutely Nothing</h3>
<p><em>Roughly</em> around 1 in 20 people infected with COVID-19 need to go to an ICU (Intensive Care Unit).<sup id="fnref13"><a href="#fn13" rel="footnote">13</a></sup> In a rich country like the USA, there&#39;s 1 ICU bed per 3400 people.<sup id="fnref14"><a href="#fn14" rel="footnote">14</a></sup> Therefore, the USA can handle 20 out of 3400 people being <em>simultaneously</em> infected or, 0.6% of the population.</p>
<p><em>Roughly</em> 1 in 20 people infected with COVID-19 need to go to an ICU (Intensive Care Unit).<sup id="fnref13"><a href="#fn13" rel="footnote">13</a></sup> In a rich country like the USA, there&#39;s 1 ICU bed per 3400 people.<sup id="fnref14"><a href="#fn14" rel="footnote">14</a></sup> Therefore, the USA can handle 20 out of 3400 people being <em>simultaneously</em> infected or, 0.6% of the population.</p>
<p>Even if we <em>more than tripled</em> that capacity to 2%, here&#39;s what would&#39;ve happened <em>if we did absolutely nothing:</em></p>
@ -475,6 +475,8 @@
<p>You&#39;re right. Masks don&#39;t stop you from getting sick<sup id="fnref31"><a href="#fn31" rel="footnote">31</a></sup>... they stop you from getting <em>others</em> sick.</p>
<p>But wait how can a simple piece of fabric block droplets in one direction, <em>but not the other?</em> The answer&#39;s counter-intuitive, yet simple:</p>
<p><img src="pics/masks.png" alt=""></p>
<p>To put a number on it: surgical masks <em>on the infectious person</em> reduce cold &amp; flu viruses in aerosols by 70%.<sup id="fnref32"><a href="#fn32" rel="footnote">32</a></sup> Reducing transmissions by 70% would be as large an impact as a lockdown!</p>
@ -746,7 +748,7 @@
<li id="fn13">
<p><strong>[UPDATED MAY 15]</strong> Many of you rightly pointed out that our previous citation for &quot;<strong>1 in 20</strong> need hospitalization&quot; was based off old USA data on <em>confirmed</em> cases which was way lower than the <em>real</em> number of cases, due to lack of tests.&nbsp;<a href="#fnref13" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
<p>So, let&#39;s look at the country with the <em>most</em> tests per capita: Iceland. As of May 15th, 2020, they had 115 hospitalized among 1802 confirmed cases ≈ 6.4% hospitalization rate, or <strong>1 in 16</strong>.</p>
<p>So, let&#39;s look at the country with the <em>most</em> tests per capita: Iceland. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200516012656/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Iceland">On May 15th, 2020</a>, they had 115 hospitalized among 1802 confirmed cases ≈ 6.4% hospitalization rate, or <strong>1 in 16</strong>.</p>
<p><a href="https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/12/science.abc3517">A more recent study of COVID-19 in France</a> using not just official confirmed cases but also antibody test data found that “3.6% of infected individuals are hospitalized”. Or, <strong>1 in 28.</strong></p>

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 127 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 144 KiB

View File

@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ the <em>second</em>-most important idea in Epidemiology 101:</p>
<h3 id="toc_0">Scenario 0: Do Absolutely Nothing</h3>
<p><em>Roughly</em> around 1 in 20 people infected with COVID-19 need to go to an ICU (Intensive Care Unit).<sup id="fnref13"><a href="#fn13" rel="footnote">13</a></sup> In a rich country like the USA, there&#39;s 1 ICU bed per 3400 people.<sup id="fnref14"><a href="#fn14" rel="footnote">14</a></sup> Therefore, the USA can handle 20 out of 3400 people being <em>simultaneously</em> infected or, 0.6% of the population.</p>
<p><em>Roughly</em> 1 in 20 people infected with COVID-19 need to go to an ICU (Intensive Care Unit).<sup id="fnref13"><a href="#fn13" rel="footnote">13</a></sup> In a rich country like the USA, there&#39;s 1 ICU bed per 3400 people.<sup id="fnref14"><a href="#fn14" rel="footnote">14</a></sup> Therefore, the USA can handle 20 out of 3400 people being <em>simultaneously</em> infected or, 0.6% of the population.</p>
<p>Even if we <em>more than tripled</em> that capacity to 2%, here&#39;s what would&#39;ve happened <em>if we did absolutely nothing:</em></p>
@ -411,6 +411,8 @@ the <em>second</em>-most important idea in Epidemiology 101:</p>
<p>You&#39;re right. Masks don&#39;t stop you from getting sick<sup id="fnref31"><a href="#fn31" rel="footnote">31</a></sup>... they stop you from getting <em>others</em> sick.</p>
<p>But wait how can a simple piece of fabric block droplets in one direction, <em>but not the other?</em> The answer&#39;s counter-intuitive, yet simple:</p>
<p><img src="pics/masks.png" alt=""></p>
<p>To put a number on it: surgical masks <em>on the infectious person</em> reduce cold &amp; flu viruses in aerosols by 70%.<sup id="fnref32"><a href="#fn32" rel="footnote">32</a></sup> Reducing transmissions by 70% would be as large an impact as a lockdown!</p>
@ -682,7 +684,7 @@ the <em>second</em>-most important idea in Epidemiology 101:</p>
<li id="fn13">
<p><strong>[UPDATED MAY 15]</strong> Many of you rightly pointed out that our previous citation for &quot;<strong>1 in 20</strong> need hospitalization&quot; was based off old USA data on <em>confirmed</em> cases which was way lower than the <em>real</em> number of cases, due to lack of tests.&nbsp;<a href="#fnref13" rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
<p>So, let&#39;s look at the country with the <em>most</em> tests per capita: Iceland. As of May 15th, 2020, they had 115 hospitalized among 1802 confirmed cases ≈ 6.4% hospitalization rate, or <strong>1 in 16</strong>.</p>
<p>So, let&#39;s look at the country with the <em>most</em> tests per capita: Iceland. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200516012656/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Iceland">On May 15th, 2020</a>, they had 115 hospitalized among 1802 confirmed cases ≈ 6.4% hospitalization rate, or <strong>1 in 16</strong>.</p>
<p><a href="https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/12/science.abc3517">A more recent study of COVID-19 in France</a> using not just official confirmed cases but also antibody test data found that “3.6% of infected individuals are hospitalized”. Or, <strong>1 in 28.</strong></p>

View File

@ -249,11 +249,11 @@ Brace yourselves for an emergency landing...
###Scenario 0: Do Absolutely Nothing
*Roughly* around 1 in 20 people infected with COVID-19 need to go to an ICU (Intensive Care Unit).[^icu_covid] In a rich country like the USA, there's 1 ICU bed per 3400 people.[^icu_us] Therefore, the USA can handle 20 out of 3400 people being *simultaneously* infected or, 0.6% of the population.
*Roughly* 1 in 20 people infected with COVID-19 need to go to an ICU (Intensive Care Unit).[^icu_covid] In a rich country like the USA, there's 1 ICU bed per 3400 people.[^icu_us] Therefore, the USA can handle 20 out of 3400 people being *simultaneously* infected or, 0.6% of the population.
[^icu_covid]: **[UPDATED MAY 15]** Many of you rightly pointed out that our previous citation for "**1 in 20** need hospitalization" was based off old USA data on *confirmed* cases which was way lower than the *real* number of cases, due to lack of tests.
So, let's look at the country with the *most* tests per capita: Iceland. As of May 15th, 2020, they had 115 hospitalized among 1802 confirmed cases ≈ 6.4% hospitalization rate, or **1 in 16**.
So, let's look at the country with the *most* tests per capita: Iceland. [On May 15th, 2020](https://web.archive.org/web/20200516012656/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Iceland), they had 115 hospitalized among 1802 confirmed cases ≈ 6.4% hospitalization rate, or **1 in 16**.
[A more recent study of COVID-19 in France](https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/05/12/science.abc3517) using not just official confirmed cases but also antibody test data found that “3.6% of infected individuals are hospitalized”. Or, **1 in 28.**
@ -506,6 +506,8 @@ You're right. Masks don't stop you from getting sick[^incoming]... they stop you
[^homemade]: [Davies, A., Thompson, K., Giri, K., Kafatos, G., Walker, J., & Bennett, A](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness/article/testing-the-efficacy-of-homemade-masks-would-they-protect-in-an-influenza-pandemic/0921A05A69A9419C862FA2F35F819D55) See Table 1: a 100% cotton T-shirt has around 2/3 the filtration efficiency as a surgical mask, for the two bacterial aerosols they tested.
But wait how can a simple piece of fabric block droplets in one direction, *but not the other?* The answer's counter-intuitive, yet simple:
![](pics/masks.png)
To put a number on it: surgical masks *on the infectious person* reduce cold & flu viruses in aerosols by 70%.[^outgoing] Reducing transmissions by 70% would be as large an impact as a lockdown!