From 9f8c4591d2d7747c5c166bbbfa19c70f7295e38a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Cross <jcross@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:14:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Clarifying conclusion about miscommunication

---
 words.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/words.html b/words.html
index 5288be2..93dfe90 100644
--- a/words.html
+++ b/words.html
@@ -876,8 +876,8 @@ a game where it's at least possible that <i>both</i> players can be better off -
 3. LOW MISCOMMUNICATION
 </p>
 <p id="conclusion_3_a2">
-The level of miscommunication can't be <i>too</i> high.
-And when there's a little bit of miscommunication, it pays to be <i>more</i> forgiving.
+Trust will break down if the level of miscommunication is <i>too</i> high.
+But when there's a little bit of miscommunication, it pays to be <i>more</i> forgiving.
 </p>
 <p id="conclusion_4">
 Of course, real-world trust is affected by much more than this.